On the Positive Sciences

Claim

On the Positive Sciences

Some people reading the posts on my blog might have said, "These are just personal interpretations; let us continue to question the systematic of things we can touch, these [other things] can wait until later."

I have a small objection regarding this. My blog posts do not present a cooked fish to the reader, but they offer insightful information on how to catch fish; that is, they explain the secrets of living life. From time to time, I use the positive sciences due to my background, but I try to explain that what is real is not the visible universe, which is the subject of positive sciences, but the spiritual realm (uhreviyat) that can be seen from a holistic perspective.

Perhaps some think: how truthful is it for him to use concepts like Multiverses and Wormholes when they are not yet fully proven, and, furthermore, to try to give meaning to religious texts like the Quran? Doesn't this weaken the probability of truth in his writings? Where and how does one access so much information about the universe's structure and properties that the accuracy of the writings can even be questioned? Can there be a living being so knowledgeable that these writings have a probability of truth?

It may be natural to ask such questions, but they can all be answered.

Firstly, I would like to state that Wormholes are a theoretical necessity, because the question of where the universe, which expands every passing millisecond, is expanding into, and what else was in the environment where the Big Bang occurred, besides the particle that exploded, must be answered. In this setup, the idea that there is a dimension outside the particle that was the subject of the Big Bang is very important and can be easily realized.

Then, the idea of whether this dimension has a connection with the universe we live in is also critical. As I said in my previous writings, each universe in the Multiverse is actually a piece of software programmed by God. And in every piece of software, the main block manages other blocks.

So, if we compare the Multiverse to software: the coder of the software is God, each character of that software is a soul, the spiritual realm is the main block, each universe in the Multiverse is a supporting block of the software, our bodies are other characters located in these supporting blocks but linked to the soul in the main block by an identifier, or a "pointer" in programming language, and other elements of the universes can be modeled as code fragments that ensure the code looks organized.

We can think that when our function in the code line is finished, our soul in the main block calls us back, and we understand the truth.

In other words, when we approach the Quran with sincerity and integrity and combine our deductions with our experiences, it will be seen that it gives us these answers. I mean all verses holistically. I hope it is understood and useful.

Computer Programmer.

Counter-claim

Literature. Standard cosmology writes the measured expansion from a hot, dense beginning. The hudūth discussion asks whether the world has a beginning in time. The entropy law says that order in a closed system does not return on its own.

What this is not evidence of

Literature. A measured expansion is not, by itself, proof of one kalām school. A rise in entropy does not measure hudūth. The two are not the same claim.