Quantum Variability and the Observer Effect

Claim

Quantum Variability and the Observer Effect

As mentioned in previous articles, when the observation process is performed, probability distributions collapse in the state of quantum superposition. At least, that's what we think. However, don't you think something is wrong about this? To me, it is quite illogical that an entity that we know is not entangled to an observer changes its state because of this observer.

If this were true, quantum entanglement would be a link between every person and every entity in the universe. This would mean that every move of every breathing person affects every event that takes place in the universe.

Perhaps this is the case, but scientific literature doesn't know anything about it yet, right? Perhaps this is where science fails us. So please don't just brush this off.

We can look for answers in religious texts. For example, if we look at the verse of the holy book of Islam, "We created humans as superior to 7 universes". Beyond its abstract meaning, there must also be a tangible meaning, right? Since God has shown this, shouldn't every human leave a mark in the whole universe? Shouldn't one be able to change the entire universe with a single action?

At first, I thought this was illogical, but then I realized I was wrong. Hope there wasn't any misunderstanding. We could talk about it again if you wish.

Counter-claim

Literature. Standard physics writes a measurement as an amplitude. Al-Ghazālī separates the link of cause and effect from logical necessity and calls it a habitual order. In the Ash‘arī tradition, ‘ādat Allāh says the cause does not compel the effect, and tajaddud al-amthāl says the accident is renewed at each moment.

What this is not evidence of

Literature. An uncertain measurement is not experimental proof of ‘ādat Allāh or of renewal at each moment. It is the distribution the model writes.